🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.